Présentation
Posté : jeu. 26 janv. 2023 13:19
Shark NV360 Vs. Dyson Cinetic Big Ball Animal Canister Vacuums: Which One Should You Choose?
For a long time, Shark and Dyson have been two chief competitors, especially in the vacuum market.
Because of their quite familiar yet excellent products take most people serious considerations before opting for a single one.
To help you solve the problem and have a deeper insight into the brands, today, I would like to weigh up their two well-known machines: Dyson Cinetic Big Ball Animal Canister Vacuum and Shark vacuum NV360.
Shark NV360 Vs. Dyson Cinetic Vacuum: Pros & Cons
In a nutshell, Shark NV360 likely receives a higher preference for its performance on various surfaces. Besides, it does have a slightly larger dust cup capacity and a better-built quality.
1. Shark NV360: Pros & Cons
PROS
2. Dyson Cinetic Big Ball Animal Canister: Pros & Cons
PROS
Design
While some assume that design is not a crucial factor to consider while comparing two vacuum machines, I believe it is wrong. Because the first aspect every customer looks at when finding their partners is how they look but not how they work. Therefore, I would prefer to prioritize the design in this article.
Concerning the build quality, the Dyson model does a decent job. It is well-equipped with a carbon fiber brush roll and a lightweight metal, protecting it better with dropping or hits. However, when I compare it with the Shark vacuum, I realized that the latter seems even more preferable. There is no difficulty in assembling or disassembling the machine. Besides, except for the metal wand, all of its parts are made from solid plastic.
On the upside, the Dyson Cinetic vacuum is rated as one of the most accessible machines to maintain. Since you can not release the filters, you do not have to clean them either. Almost all of the Dyson parts can become polished after a single cleaning with a dry cloth. Of course, you have to wash the dust cup and the brush roll to get rid of dust and dirt suck up.
By stark contrast, a Shark vacuum features many complicated parts that need frequently maintain.
What's more, both machines have pretty similar dimensions, and they are easy to store.
Performance
As I have just mentioned, the Shark model outperforms its counterpart in cleaning a wide range of surfaces.
For instance, it meets no challenges while picking up large and small debris on either high-pile or low-pile carpets. A similar efficiency occurs on bare floors.
On the other hand, Dyson shows terrible works in sucking up large dust clouds such as cereal or rice. Instead of removing them, it tends to spread them around or even being clogged with them.
Final Words
Lastly, above are some different and similar features between Dyson Cinetic Animal Canister and Shark navigator NV360.
Hopefully, you find the information helpful to buy the most suitable machine!
For a long time, Shark and Dyson have been two chief competitors, especially in the vacuum market.
Because of their quite familiar yet excellent products take most people serious considerations before opting for a single one.
To help you solve the problem and have a deeper insight into the brands, today, I would like to weigh up their two well-known machines: Dyson Cinetic Big Ball Animal Canister Vacuum and Shark vacuum NV360.
Shark NV360 Vs. Dyson Cinetic Vacuum: Pros & Cons
In a nutshell, Shark NV360 likely receives a higher preference for its performance on various surfaces. Besides, it does have a slightly larger dust cup capacity and a better-built quality.
1. Shark NV360: Pros & Cons
PROS
- Handheld configuration available
- Suck up small and large debris incredibly well
- Work efficiently on many kinds of surfaces
- Not easy to maneuver
- Require frequent maintenance
2. Dyson Cinetic Big Ball Animal Canister: Pros & Cons
PROS
- Perform well on sucking up pet hair or pet litter
- Easy to maintain
- Virtually no recurring cost
- Less longevity
Design
While some assume that design is not a crucial factor to consider while comparing two vacuum machines, I believe it is wrong. Because the first aspect every customer looks at when finding their partners is how they look but not how they work. Therefore, I would prefer to prioritize the design in this article.
Concerning the build quality, the Dyson model does a decent job. It is well-equipped with a carbon fiber brush roll and a lightweight metal, protecting it better with dropping or hits. However, when I compare it with the Shark vacuum, I realized that the latter seems even more preferable. There is no difficulty in assembling or disassembling the machine. Besides, except for the metal wand, all of its parts are made from solid plastic.
On the upside, the Dyson Cinetic vacuum is rated as one of the most accessible machines to maintain. Since you can not release the filters, you do not have to clean them either. Almost all of the Dyson parts can become polished after a single cleaning with a dry cloth. Of course, you have to wash the dust cup and the brush roll to get rid of dust and dirt suck up.
By stark contrast, a Shark vacuum features many complicated parts that need frequently maintain.
What's more, both machines have pretty similar dimensions, and they are easy to store.
Performance
As I have just mentioned, the Shark model outperforms its counterpart in cleaning a wide range of surfaces.
For instance, it meets no challenges while picking up large and small debris on either high-pile or low-pile carpets. A similar efficiency occurs on bare floors.
On the other hand, Dyson shows terrible works in sucking up large dust clouds such as cereal or rice. Instead of removing them, it tends to spread them around or even being clogged with them.
Final Words
Lastly, above are some different and similar features between Dyson Cinetic Animal Canister and Shark navigator NV360.
Hopefully, you find the information helpful to buy the most suitable machine!
de la Drôme
